House Intelligence Committee’s NSA Surveillance Bill Includes New Threats and Old



  • Thrown last-minute into a torrent of competing legislation, a new bill meant to expand the NSA:undefined:’:undefined:s broad surveillance powers is the most recent threat to American privacy. It increases who is subject to surveillance, allows warrantless search of American communications, expands how collected data can be used, and treats constitutional protections as voluntary.

    The bill must be stopped immediately. There is little time: despite the bill:undefined:’:undefined:s evening release yesterday, November 29, a committee is scheduled to markup the bill tomorrow, December 1.

    The bill is called theFISA Amendments Reauthorization Act of 2017, and it was introduced by Rep. Nunes (R-CA), the Chair of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. It shares the same name asanother bill introduced in the Senate in October.

    Both bills are attempts to reauthorize Section 702 of the FISA Amendments Act, a powerful surveillance authority that allows the NSA to target and collect communications of non-U.S. persons living outside the United States. Section 702 predictably causes the incidental collection of American communications that are swept up during foreign intelligence surveillance, too.

    These are some of the most glaring problems with this House bill.

    New Potential Surveillance Targets

    The Nunes bill expands the statutory terms :undefined:“:undefined:foreign power:undefined:”:undefined: and :undefined:“:undefined:agent of a foreign power:undefined:”:undefined:—:undefined:both of which can be approved for NSA surveillance:undefined:—:undefined:to include a broad set of cyber-related activities. These activities include efforts to impair the :undefined:“:undefined:confidentiality, integrity, or availability of computers,:undefined:”:undefined: so long as those activities threaten the national defense or security of the United States.

    But, according to the bill, surveillance can be approved for individuals not actually acting on behalf of a foreign power. Instead, those individuals must simply either knowingly aid or abet another person who is performing :undefined:“:undefined:international malicious cyber activity.:undefined:”:undefined:

    This expansion of potential surveillance targets would extend not just to the NSA:undefined:’:undefined:s Section 702 surveillance, but also to all other kinds of foreign intelligence gathering. In this regard, far from reforming the federal government:undefined:’:undefined:s surveillance activities, the Nunes bill would significantly expand them.

    An Optional :undefined:“:undefined:Fix:undefined:”:undefined: to the Backdoor Search Loophole

    Under Section 702, the NSA targets foreign individuals located outside the United States. Predictably, communications written and sent by Americans are also swept up in that collection. Those communications are then stored in a massive database that can be searched by other intelligence agencies, including the FBI and CIA. When those agencies search the data:undefined:—:undefined:even when it belongs to U.S. persons:undefined:—:undefined:they do not obtain a warrant.

    These searches are called :undefined:“:undefined:backdoor:undefined:”:undefined: searches because they avoid the constitutional warrant requirement provided to U.S. persons by the Fourth Amendment.

    While some of the other pending Section 702 reauthorization bills have proposed warrant requirements on backdoor searches of Americans:undefined:’:undefined: communications, the Nunes bill gives the government theoption whether or not to seek a warrant before reading these communications.

    From the bill: :undefined:“:undefined:the Federal Bureau of Investigation may apply for an order of the [Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court]:undefined:”:undefined: to approve access to such communications.

    Constitutional rights are guaranteed, not optional.

    Other Problems

    Borrowing from its Senate-side sibling, the Nunes bill provides guidance on how to restart :undefined:“:undefined:about:undefined:”:undefined: collection, an invasive form of NSA surveillance that the agency ended earlier this year. Also, in defining :undefined:“:undefined:about:undefined:”:undefined: collection, the bill includes language that suggests the NSA can target :undefined:“:undefined:a facility, place, premises or property:undefined:”:undefined: for surveillance. This could mean that the NSA has the authority to target entire buildings, houses, or data centers populated by U.S. persons or their communications.

    To learn more about what:undefined:’:undefined:s wrong with the Nunes bill, check out theopposition letter that EFF joined, along with dozens of other groups.

    What Now?

    Your voice is needed immediately. Rep. Nunes:undefined:’:undefined: FISA Amendments Reauthorization Act of 2017 will be sent to markup by the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence tomorrow, on December 1. That is a remarkably short time for this process.

    Call and contact your representatives today to stop this bill. Tell them it is unacceptable.





  • Make ISO from DVD

    In this case I had an OS install disk which was required to be on a virtual node with no optical drive, so I needed to transfer an image to the server to create a VM

    Find out which device the DVD is:

    lsblk

    Output:

    NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT sda 8:0 0 465.8G 0 disk ├─sda1 8:1 0 1G 0 part /boot └─sda2 8:2 0 464.8G 0 part ├─centos-root 253:0 0 50G 0 lvm / ├─centos-swap 253:1 0 11.8G 0 lvm [SWAP] └─centos-home 253:2 0 403G 0 lvm /home sdb 8:16 1 14.5G 0 disk /mnt sr0 11:0 1 4.1G 0 rom /run/media/rick/CCSA_X64FRE_EN-US_DV5

    Therefore /dev/sr0 is the location , or disk to be made into an ISO

    I prefer simplicity, and sometimes deal with the fallout after the fact, however Ive repeated this countless times with success.

    dd if=/dev/sr0 of=win10.iso

    Where if=Input file and of=output file

    I chill out and do something else while the image is being copied/created, and the final output:

    8555456+0 records in 8555456+0 records out 4380393472 bytes (4.4 GB) copied, 331.937 s, 13.2 MB/s

    Fin!

    read more
  • Recreate postrgresql database template encode to ASCII

    UPDATE pg_database SET datistemplate = FALSE WHERE datname = 'template1';

    Now we can drop it:

    DROP DATABASE template1;

    Create database from template0, with a new default encoding:

    CREATE DATABASE template1 WITH TEMPLATE = template0 ENCODING = 'UNICODE'; UPDATE pg_database SET datistemplate = TRUE WHERE datname = 'template1'; \c template1 VACUUM FREEZE;

    read more
});